Montana Pterodactyl

Regarding the report of the “Pterosaur in Montana, 2009,” here is part of the account:

” . . . just as it was getting dark, but it was a bright full moon also, my bro in law pointed behind me and said ‘What the hell is that?’ and I turned around and saw the largest flying creature I’ve ever seen. It was heading straight towards us. . . . It flew straight over us and off into the horizon. It must have had a 20 foot wingspan. It was gigantic. It flew about 50 feet over our heads.”

What is left out of that account is that the two men could even hear the sound of the wings flapping. This was near the Cooney Reservoir, early in the evening of September 4, 2009. (The interview was conducted by the living-pterosaur researcher Jonathan Whitcomb.) There seems to be no indication whether or not this particular creature has the capability of bioluminescence, sometimes reported in ropen-like nocturnal pterosaur-like flying animals.

“Pterodactyl” is a common unofficial word for “pterosaur,” but “dinosaur bird” is also sometimes used.

Marfa lights: new insights

I recently interviewed two eyewitnesses of the Marfa Lights of Texas. One was a young man (G.) traveling through Texas early in 2010; the other (H.), a long-term researcher of the Marfa Lights. After each interview, I became more convinced that these strange flying lights are closely related to the ropen lights of Papua New Guinea.

Sighting by a traveler

G. described one of the lights as many miles away (at least apparently), flying around in the same general area, far above the ground. This light lasted for well over an hour (approaching dawn), during which time several other lights (apparently closer) appeared to the left. The group of lights here behaved somewhat differently, seeming, perhaps, to interact with each other, at least with my interpretation of the descriptions. At least once, the first light dived toward the ground.

Sighting by an investigator

H. described one of his sightings as in close range, for one of the lights flew down into some nearby bushes (H. was on or near the Marfa Lights viewing platform at the time). The light scurried about in the bushes, like what would be expected of an “animal.” It then flew up into the air and quickly disappeared.

Problems with “ball lightning,” “atmospheric,” and geologic-cause interpretations

A common description of genuine Marfa Lights (those obviously not car headlights) is that they dance. Two or more lights seem to interact at times, sometimes weaving in and out, sometimes seeming to make one light divide into two. In other words, there is regular coordination. This can be explained easily by attributing the lights to living entities, not easily to non-living objects.

When two or more predators hunt together, they move and position themselves in predictable patterns. Whales may circle schools of fish; lionesses may partially surround a herd of antelopes. I believe that some of these American ghost lights, including the Marfa Lights, involve flying creatures that use special patterns of flight (and sometimes special patterns using their bioluminescence) to catch bats. One of those patterns involves two of the creatures flying towards each other: The bats fly away from one predator only to be caught by the other. To fly toward each other, two predators first fly away from each other, then turn around for the coordinated attack.

I have been told that the mountains near where many Marfa Lights fly are of volcanic origin and that this relates to geologic characteristics that contribute to the creation of the lights. Why, then, would the researcher (probably one of the top experts on the ML) have seen one of the lights fly far from the mountain and scurry around in some bushes near the observation platform? Doesn’t that seem much more like a predator that has left the common hunting ground for a moment? How could the mountain have caused that flying light?

When have distinct glowing flying balls interacted like they were dancing and then scientifically been demonstrated to be ball lightning or natural atmospheric effects? I don’t mean speculated to be; I mean demonstrated to be. I know that human subjective reasoning can play tricks on us sometimes, but what if our intuitive reasoning (intelligent-entities interpretation) is correct in this instance? Why not consider the possibility that these dancing lights come from living things? Some descriptions of American ghost lights includes the word “fireflies.” Let’s keep an open mind to the possibility that a new scientific breakthrough will include the discovery of a flying bioluminescence more powerful than even a thousand fireflies. And let’s coordinate our reasoning so we may someday discover the true nature of these strange lights.

(The discovery of an animate source for the lights will not necessarily show the flying creature is a “dinosaur bird” (AKA “pterosaur”), but the possibility is exciting, whatever it is.)

Getting more up to date, the first explanation that tied Marfa Lights to sightings of living pterosaurs was about the bats that live year-round in southwest Texas: the Big Brown Bat. It was thought that this bat was the main reason for the Marfa Lights flying the way they did. More recently, there have been other suggestions about what the flying predators may be eating. This is in addition to bats, not instead of bats.

Nonfiction book on Acambaro figurines

Mystery in Acambaro, (by Charles Hapgood, reprinted in 2000), brings to light the many clay figurines, some of which depict dinosaurs interacting with humans. According to, “Hapgood researched the Acambaro collection . . . with Erle Stanley Gardner . . . in the mid-1960s. . . . hundreds of clay figurines that are apparently thousands of years old; however, they depict such bizarre animals [dinosaurs] and scenes that most archaeologists dismiss them as an elaborate hoax.”

But the strong suggestion (if not proof) that dinosaurs lived with those ancient people–that is what prompted some archaeologists to dismiss the figurines as hoaxes; the evidences for authenticity were not considered because of the depictions of dinosaurs.

From the foreword of the book itself we read, “In 1944 an accidental discovery of an extremely controversial nature occurred in Acambaro, Mexico. The find eventually yeilded over 33, 500 objects of ceramic and stone (including jade), and knives of obsidian.”

According to Amazon, this book has 256 pages, but the copy I’m looking at has only 153 (plus about 20 pages of advertisements). Nevertheless the subject is fascinating, with many illustrations of the ancient figurines.

Book about living pterosaurs in the U.S.

Nonfiction book "Live Pterosaurs in America"Live Pterosaurs in America: Sightings of Apparent Pterosaurs in the United States–this nonfiction paperback may be the only book ever written about apparent pterosaurs seen across the country, from West Coast to East Coast and from Texas to Maine. But this is more than just a compilation of eyewitness stories; the reasons for the delay in official living-pterosaur discovery are explained.

The delayed official admission of living pterosaurs is compared to the delayed official admission of powered flight: a few Bible-believing creationists early in the 21st Century compared with the Wright Brothers early in the 20th Century. All of them were labeled “liar,” notwithstanding they all proclaimed the simple truth.

Unlike the first two editions of the book “Searching for Ropens,” this newer book about live pterosaurs is a pure cryptozoology book, not a creation-religion book (although the creationist views of the investigators are briefly referenced). No reader should be offended, regardless of origin philosophy.

According to one reader, “The problem with science is that we think we know it all and that is far from reality. This book shows courage to continue the search. If you have an interest in cryptozoology you should read this.” (Dale S. Reeder, Pennsylvania)

See the official web site of this cryptozoology book. ($12.50 — 104 pages)